The Great Latin American Songbook

 

Panamanian pianist Danilo Pérez made it a point, early on in his career, to expand the repertoire including music from the Great Latin American Songbook

 

This piece was first published by JazzTimes on December, 2009

As singer Claudia Acuña launched into her first song at her concert at Festival Miami at the University of Miami, in Coral Gables, FL, a few weeks ago, her group´s swing, her own ease at coiling and releasing the melody, even her body language, all said jazz. But the words were in Spanish, and the song, “Gracias a la Vida” by Chilean singer-songwriter Violeta Parra, was no jazz standard but a modern classic of Latin American folk music.

To those familiar with the original song, the juxtaposition brought smiles and a few  “Can you do that to that song?” looks. To those who weren’t, this was simply jazz — with an accent.

But for all of us at that show that night, it was also a glimpse into a world of possibilities.

Continue reading

The Great (Latin) American Songbook

As singer Claudia Acuña launched into her first song at her concert at Festival Miami at the University of Miami, in Coral Gables, FL, a few weeks ago, her group´s swing, her own ease at coiling and releasing the melody, even her body language, all said jazz. But the words were in Spanish, and the song, “Gracias a la Vida” by Chilean singer-songwriter Violeta Parra, was no jazz standard but a modern classic of Latin American folk music.

To those familiar with the original song, the juxtaposition brought smiles and a few  “Can you do that to that song?” looks.

To those who weren’t, this was simply jazz with an accent.

But for all of us at that show that night, it was also a glimpse into a world of possibilities.

Acuña is part of a younger generation of Latin jazz performers, composers and arrangers that continues to expand and  re-define Latin jazz by exploring the home-grown music styles of their native cultures with the tools, practices, and sensibilities of jazz. As they do, they are also growing the vocabulary of jazz by including not only indigenous rhythms and, sometimes, instruments, but also their own standards, songs that are part of what can be called the Great Latin American Songbook.

Consider Panamanian pianist Danilo Perez´s takes on Ariel Ramirez’s “Alfonsina y el Mar,” or Silvio Rodriguez’s “Rabo de Nube;” Argentine trumpeter Diego Urcola’s version of tango icon Carlos Gardel’s “El Dia Que Me Quieras,”  Venezuelan pianist Ed Simon’s reworking of  Simon Diaz’s hit “Caballo Viejo,” or  Acuña herself, including songs like Djavan’s “Oceano” and Parra’s “Volver a los 17,”  alongside traditional jazz standards and her own originals.

Latin songs have been part of the jazz repertoire – from boleros such as “Cuando Vuelva a Tu Lado”  (“What a Difference a Day Makes”), and Consuelo Velázquez’s “Bésame Mucho,” to Antonio Carlos Jobim’s classic bossa novas. And some artists have began to discover this Pan-Latin repertoire. Charlie Haden has been a pioneer at it for reasons both musical and ideological. But there have been others, including pianist Bobo Stenson (“Alfonsina y el Mar,” “Chiquilín de Bachin”), saxophonist Charles Lloyd (“Rabo de Nube”), and guitarist Al DiMeola (the music by New Tango master Astor Piazzolla, including “Libertango,” and “Adios Nonino.”)

Still, what this Latin jazz movement is bringing along, musically and perhaps commercially, goes beyond  the chance to find the next novelty song or add the exotic touch..

Songs become standards for many reasons, some are strictly musical (such as their harmonic and melodic possibilities), some, for lack of a better word, are social. The popularity of a song creates familiarity and that provides artists and audiences with a shared language. Or perhaps a particular tune has a social or political message. (An appeal to our childhood’s memories with “Someday My Prince Will Come;” an appeal to our conscience with “Strange Fruit.”)

The broad Pan-Latin repertoire still coming into view offers all of the above, and more.

For starters, there is a musical wealth there – rhythmically, harmonically, melodically and texturally — that deserves a closer look. (Lyrics in Spanish are a battle for another day) And just as intriguing, the way these artists are operating on these songs, often coming closer to re-composition than arranging, is opening new ways to re-conceptualize both, the Latin repertoire and jazz standards.

Consider, for example, Argentine pianist Adrián Iaies, whose work includes both tango treatments of jazz standards (such as “Round Midnight,” and “Nefertiti” ) and jazz reworkings of tango classics.

There is no improvisation, in the jazz sense, in tango. Still, Iaies suggested, “tango is the popular music form closest to jazz, not only because of its origins – it’s rooted in black people’s music plus European [music] elements — but because the harmonic structure of a tango is similar to that of a standard.”

“Think of [tango classic] ‘Los Mareados.’ The intro, which is beautiful, is already a standard. Someone like Keith Jarrett would play half an hour over that — and then he’d still have a section in a minor key and a section in major to work with. In tango you have sections in minor and major tonalities so you can actually tell two different stories, so when it comes to improvising you can set up different things. “

Conversely, he added, “any minor key [jazz] standard can be a tango. ‘Yesterdays,’ or ‘Alone Together,’ are tangos. They just forgot to write the lyrics. ‘Blame it on my youth,’ is a tango. ‘You and the night and the music,’ for me has always been a tango. [Monk’s] ‘Reflections’ has certain chromatic things that come very close to tango.”

As for the audiences, the reactions in the faces of some of the people in the audience at Acuña´s concert in Miami told the story. Many of them had never heard those songs played that way. They might have not have known that Acuña was doing her own version of  “Come Sunday” — but they certainly got what she was trying to do with Victor Jara’s “Te Recuerdo, Amanda.”  And now they were curious, edging forward in their seats. So this is jazz, too? What else you’ve got?

Which brings up another intriguing point: this repertoire comes with its own, large, ready-made audience, a potential new audience for jazz, perhaps unfamiliar with the jazz tradition, but certainly aware of these songs. And wasn’t reaching this kind of listeners part of the idea behind Coltrane picking “My Favorite Things” or  Miles playing “Human Nature”?

I don’t expect “Alfonsina” to become a standard – not yet. But given the demographic trends in this country (and the United States is already one of the largest Spanish-speaking countries in the world) and an untapped audience to the South, wouldn’t it make sense to at least explore this repertoire? As a jazz artist, what do you have to lose? Especially considering that the standard jazz book is past overdue for updating and renewal and even serious jazz artists keep trying and hoping that covers of  songs by Joni Mitchell, Nirvana, The Flaming Lips, and Nick Drake, do the trick.

Yes, as I’ve been reminded over and over, the great obstacle for any of these great Latin songs to be brought into the standard repertoire is that most North American jazz musicians simply are not familiar with them. Fair enough.

If that’s the case, let me suggest that they might consider doing what their Latin counterparts have done, and still do, about the music in The Great American Songbook: Ask, listen and learn.

September 2009, Jazz Times

Reconsidering Nat King Cole

 

Nat King Cole with his second trio featuring Johnny Miller, bass and Oscar Moore, guitar.

This post was first published by JAZZIZ magazine, on December, 2007

Nat King Cole was not the first, nor would he be the last, jazz artist whose success as pop singer nearly eclipsed his brilliance as instrumentalist. Consider Louis Armstrong and, a generation later, George Benson, just to name two prominent examples.

Cole, who died of cancer in February 1965, barely a month before his 49th birthday, was a best-selling singer and global pop star. Unbeknownst to many of his fans then and now, he was also one of the great pianists in jazz history.

His tight swing, fluid runs, and economic-but-elegant voicings became an influence on pianists as diverse as Art Tatum (whose trio was inspired by Cole’s), Ahmad Jamal, Bill Evans, and Oscar Peterson (to the point that reportedly Cole once mistook Peterson for himself on a blindfold test). His recordings with Norman Granz stand as classics. (Check for his 1942 sessions with Lester Young.) And his unusual trio — piano, bass, and electric guitar — which he led from 1937 to, roughly, 1951, set standards for small combos in jazz. The King Cole Trio swung hard yet, seemingly, effortlessly and was a model at balancing individuality and ensemble playing. As part of their set and, “to break the monotony,” as Cole once put it, the pianist and leader also sang a couple of tunes.

But he quickly understood that trying to reach a wider audience meant, plainly, “More singing, less playing.” Cole knew he was dealing with what he exasperatedly called “dog tunes,” but the artist was also a husband and father — and an eminently practical man.

“You know how long it took the trio to reach a point where we started making a little prize money and found a little success? For years, we did nothing but play for musicians and other hip people. And while we played that, we practically starved to death,” says Cole in an interview quoted in Leslie Gourse’s Unforgettable: The Life and Mystique of Nat King Cole. “When we did click, it wasn’t on the strength of the good jazz we played, either. We clicked with pop songs, pretty ballads, and novelty stuff. Wouldn’t we have been crazy if we’d turned right around after getting a break and started playing pure jazz again? We would have lost the crowd right away.”

Jazz’s loss was pop’s gain. He stood up from the piano and sang, and singing became Cole’s career. And what a career it was. He had a rich, warm, smooth voice of limited range but extraordinary expressiveness. He also had impeccable diction and a talent for storytelling capable of making even some of the most inane novelty tunes of the day listenable, if not believable. (And he turned a few of them into hits.) He also had a presence — the smile, the mysterious almond-shaped eyes, and the gentlemanly demeanor. It made Cole an international star.

The Collectors’ Choice reissues from his Capitol catalog (beginning in 1955 to his posthumous, 1965 collection Looking Back) catch Cole at the height of his powers. He’s in fine form as vocalist, is working with top arrangers (Nelson Riddle, Billy May, Gordon Jenkins), secure enough to explore (his much-maligned but enormously popular country albums), and reach out to new audiences (his albums En Español). And he even has the muscle to indulge, to a degree, his first love (the piano), as well as jazz fans (Penthouse Serenade (1955)/The Piano Style of Nat King Cole (1956).

The twofers have smartly been put together thematically, or by pairing discs by the same arranger. Cole remains unmistakably himself, but different arrangers bring up different qualities in his singing — which was precisely Cole’s point, says producer James Ritz.

“Billy [May] was with Charlie Barnet and Jimmy Dorsey, so he was more jazz-oriented. Nelson [Riddle]’s natural talent was to complement singers. Billy developed into that, but in a much more explosive brassy way, adding more of a jazz sensibility to the arrangements. And then you had Gordon Jenkins who was closer to classical music with his mammoth string arrangements. Nat, like Sinatra, saw the beauty in all the different approaches and what they could add to his talent.”

Check Cole’s unhurried, graceful skating over May’s agitated arrangement in “Just One of Those Things.” The contrast becomes part of the interpretation: A worldly man accepting that a “trip to the moon in gossamer wings” love affair must, perhaps inevitably, cool down. Then consider Cole and Riddle’s collaboration on [i]Sings for Two in Love[i] which features several standards, something not as common as it might seem. (“Nat didn’t sings standards, he made them,” says producer Ritz. “The songs he sang have become standards because he sang them.”)

Time and again, Riddle finds an engaging balance between swing and romantic pop, strings and all. (Listen to the setting he offers Cole in “There Will Never Be Another You.”) On the instrumental albums, Riddle sets Cole’s piano to large ensembles and string orchestras and the overall effect, reinforced by Cole’s straight-up reading of the material, is closer to instrumental pop than jazz. (For a more satisfying “late” Cole playing jazz seek After Midnight, which is not included in this set because it’s still available elsewhere.) What you get on these albums is just a hint of Cole the pianist. But then, by the time of The Piano Style of Nat King Cole,” the jazz pianist was a major pop star.